Tag Archives: Film

Coyote County Loser Coming to the OC

If my post yesterday made you think (or even if it didn’t), go check out Coyote County Loser September 4-10 at Cinema City Theaters in Anaheim Hills, California.  Coyote County Loser is an independent film by Roebuck Media, and it fits in well with the themes I touched upon yesterday (see my own review of the film here.  Warning: spoilers contained!).

It is a delightful romantic comedy.  When I watched it, I really had to chuckle about the exchanges between the two main characters.  Several times, though their interactions were slightly exaggerated for effect (which is to be expected in a romantic comedy film, to a certain extent), there was more than a bit of truth therein about the battle of the sexes.  I was entertained and got to ponder a deep lesson about love at the same time.  I highly recommend it for anyone wanting to see a tastefully done film on love and relationships.

Roebuck Media

Yesterday I had lunch with film writer and producer Jacob Roebuck.   He recently produced his first film Coyote County Loser, which I reviewed here.  It recently won best comedy at the Breckenridge Film Festival.

Jacob is an interesting guy, and an absolute pleasure to converse with.  I mean I really had fun!  I learned a ton of things about the film industry, especially animated films.  This guy’s a go getter, and I’m looking forward to seeing what him and his crew come up with over the next few years!

You can follow CCL by clicking on the link above, or you can join the film’s Facebook page.

Knowing

Saw Knowing last night…

Two words: freaky….deaky.

Haven’t been this weirded out since in a long, long time.

knowing

PS–Sorry for the late post.  Internet was down last night.  I’ll have something more substantive up this evening.

Coyote County Loser

I feel important; I actually went to a movie premier.

Last week I went to the premier of Coyote County Loser, an independent film by Roebuck Media.

This was a very funny romantic comedy with an excellent message about marriage.

**(SPOILER ALERT)**

The movie centers around two characters: Jack, a love-em-and-leave-em heart throb from LA, and Lauren, a down-to-earth country girl who demands high standards from men.

Lauren is a love advice-giving radio show host in (very, very) small town New Mexico.  The thing is that she gives horrible advice, coaching women to have a “non-negotiable checklist,” or NNCL, in the hunt for a mate.   What’s hilarious is what she coaches the women to put on the list.  Jesus wouldn’t even meet their standards!

Men are not grocery lists, and the search for a marriage partner is not like the search for buying a car (another analogy she uses frequently).  If I dated a woman with that attitude, I’d feel quite degraded.

Jack comes along.  He gets stuck in the one-horse town on his way to LA.  After listening to the show, he recognizes the silliness, and decides to challenge her on the air.  His advice is just as askew; he takes a “follow your heart” attitude, calling out the romantic in all of us.

Sounds good, until you realize that Lauren’s mother left her father when she took just such an attitude.  Dad, evidently, no longer made mom happy.  He no longer lit the romantic spark in her, so she was outta there. This wreaked incredible brokenness in Lauren, so much so that she went to a far extreme in an effort to protect herself.

A “legacy marriage” couple provides the balance, though.  They have been married for 48 happy years.  The wife had no list; the husband, at first, was quite awkward at romance.  What did they have that Jack and Lauren overlooked?  Commitment.  They know that love means sacrificing for the other, and that has made their 48 years together more romantic than Jack could ever imagine, and stronger than any ingredient Lauren’s “list” mentality could ever provide.

Though we might mock Jack and Lauren in our minds, they reflect common attitudes about love, don’t they?  How many women have I run into with a NNCL?  Even if they don’t call it that, the things they require to even consider *one* date with a man are ridiculous.

Sure, having a few requirements is necessary: follower disciple of Christ, wants to embrace responsibility, wants to be a dad, etc.  But, geez, cut out the laundry list!  No wonder they are still single!

I admit: I used to have a NNCL myself.  I didn’t realize how degrading and stupid that was.

We also go the other extreme, throwing caution to the wind, dating and loving whomever we fancy.  If he is hot and you like him, go for it!  Who cares if he’s not a solid Christian; he makes you happy, and that’s all that matters.  He’s soooo dreamy, and there’s soooo much chemistry between us (translate: he’s great in bed).

Pardon me while I go wretch.

Strangely, many of us manage to have both attitudes at the same time.  I don’t know how we do it.

Yes, it is downright silly to compare a man to any list one may have.  Having an element of spontaneous romance is fun.

Yes, if all you think about is what will make you happy, you will end up trampling on others’ hearts and becoming quite a pit-i-ful creature yourself.  Relationships are serious business; there is no time for this “whatever makes you happy” claptrap.

Jack and Lauren must meet in the middle to find the truth; however, without the commitment to sacrifice for the other, any relationship is only doomed to end in smoke and rubble.

Go see the movie.

Check out the following related posts:

Movie review: Fireproof

A Boy Becomes a Man (Gran Torino movie review)

Seven Pounds

_________________________________________________________________________________

If you liked what you read, please consider subscribing to my RSS feed (RSS button at the top right in the sidebar).

Fireproof: One Man’s Modus Ponens is Another’s Modus Tollens

I felt embarrassed at moments during the movie.  Whenever there was a scene where the gospel was preached or God was talked about, I felt like making fun of the movie’s preachyness.

A great many people have had the same reaction.  One local radio station, KROC, ridiculed Fireproof as well for its weirdness.

We don’t like preachy movies.

But it occured to me that perhaps that says more about me and the culture than it does about the movie.  Why should we feel embarrassed at such an explicitly Christian movie?  Perhaps it’s not the movie that is wrong for it’s preachyness, but me and the culture that’s wrong for ridiculing such things.

Whenever I feel such embarrassment, I need to start turning the tables like that.

I look forward to the day when the culture is no longer like that.  That day will not come, though, this side of the eternal divide.

Movie Review: Fireproof

I just finished seeing Fireproof.

Acting: subparfireproofposterart2

dialogue: cheesy

Preachy?  Definitely

However, I liked it, you know?  I actually got emotional during the scene at the end between Caleb and his mother.  The movie really gave me something to dwell upon as I enter my own marriage.  I saw glimpses of my own selfishness in Caleb.  For example, I nitpick in my head over small habits my roommates have, but I myself do the same things.

The movie really sobered me up by showing me where that sort of selfishness could end.

Though it was overly preachy and the acting was terrible (besides Cameron, most of the actors were church volunteers, not professional thespians.  This is helpful to know up front.), there were a few powerful gospel scenes.  The biggest one, perhaps, was when Caleb kept pushing away discussion of God, then went on to vigorously complain about his wife constantly rejecting him no matter what he does for her.  While he reaches out (or so he thinks…he’s just going through the motions, really) to her, she “spits in his face.”  The parallel between that and his relationship to God becomes quite apparent soon after.

It was good to see a movie promoting marriage values, there were some very funny moments, and it was deep in places.  It really made me stop and consider my ways.  Hey, being “provoked to godliness” by a film is never a bad thing.

Michael Brown has a helpful review here.  Particularly helpful were the following two “con” points about the film:

  • Presents Christianity as the solution to a bad marriage.The reality is that there are plenty of unbelievers who are happily married (relatively speaking). This is because marriage is a creational, pre-Fall institution that belongs to the realm of common grace, not redemption. Marriage (that is, a lifelong, monogomous covenant between one man and one woman) is for all people, not merely Christians. Chances are there is an unbelieving married couple on your street who have a pretty good marriage, due to their relationship being marked with mutual service, love and devotion. Conversely, there are plenty of Christian marriages that look like the one depicted at the beginning of the movie (i.e. characterized by selfishness, unforgiveness, anger, and bitterness), due to the Christian couple refusing to get over themselves and grow up. So, this is very misleading. And unbelievers are not so stupid that they can’t pick up on this. Just read the reviews of this film.
  • Presents a theology of glory. More of the above. Unfortunately, the message preached (and I mean preached) in this movie inevitably comes across to say, “Become a Christian and the circumstances of your life will improve.” Well, that is a) not true and b) not a valid reason for becoming a Christian. Read 1 Corinthians 15. The only valid reason for becoming a Christian is that the message of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ is TRUE, not that it offers the spiritual magic to have your best life right now.

Candace Watters at Boundless provides another review that balances out Michael’s review here.

I’m easy to please, and perhaps that’s why I liked it.  It’s good to see strong Christians in the film-making business, and I hope we can keep that up while improving the quality of our films at the same time.

Check out the following related posts:

A Boy Becomes a Man (Gran Torino movie review)

Seven Pounds