Yesterday I posted on God’s foreknowledge and our free acts. Bottom line: God’s foreknowledge does not eradicate our free will.

photo credit: elfwood.com
Today, I’m going more on the offensive. From time to time in my philosophical meanderings, I encounter a determinist, someone who believes we do not have free will. They offer a few reasons for this. Belief in Naturalism or some form of Scientism is most often the culprit (Determinism follows quite nicely from a naturalist worldview.).
I’ve always marveled at those who declare determinism from the rooftops, then go about arguing for it. They write blog posts about it. They start discussions about it. They muse over it in philosophy class. They trade punches about it online. They even question it over coffee.
I wonder: what, exactly, do determinists in such circumstances actually think they are accomplishing? If it’s true, my beliefs, thoughts, questions, emotions, etc are causally determined by atoms, brain chemistry, particles colliding, and such. Isn’t it, well, a moot point to argue, discuss, persuade, question, and muse about it?
Somethin’s got to give: either determinism, or our normal way of operating in life.
I could go on and talk about other demerits of the view in more detail. Suffice it to say: it is virtually impossible to live it out. A determinist must make a Scheafferian upper story leap of faith to get along in life.
That alone doesn’t bode too well for the view.
Next question: which worldview makes the best sense of free will?
The answer to that doesn’t bode too well for Naturalism.
If you like what you read, please consider subscribing to my RSS feed (RSS button found at the top right in the sidebar).
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: 