<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relevance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pugnaciousirishman.com/2008/12/16/relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pugnaciousirishman.com/2008/12/16/relevance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classroom Management: not for the Faint of Heart &#171; The Pugnacious Irishman</title>
		<link>http://pugnaciousirishman.com/2008/12/16/relevance/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Classroom Management: not for the Faint of Heart &#171; The Pugnacious Irishman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugnaciousirishman.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Relevance [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Relevance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Bordner</title>
		<link>http://pugnaciousirishman.com/2008/12/16/relevance/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Bordner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugnaciousirishman.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad,

Yea...its weird what&#039;s taken for &quot;relevant&quot; these days.  The stuff that&#039;s stood the test of time is where its at...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>Yea&#8230;its weird what&#8217;s taken for &#8220;relevant&#8221; these days.  The stuff that&#8217;s stood the test of time is where its at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Ovenell-Carter</title>
		<link>http://pugnaciousirishman.com/2008/12/16/relevance/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Ovenell-Carter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugnaciousirishman.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here, here. We&#039;ve had this very conversation many times in our staffrooom. I went to a workshop and heard David Booth (OISE at U of Toronto) say that the best teacher in the world couldn&#039;t make a dull book interesting. By dull, of course, he didn&#039;t mean Homer or Horace; he meant whatever teen novel is in fashion at the moment; Twilight, I suppose. The teacher&#039;s job is to show kids how Homer and Horace are relevant. the good ones can do that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, here. We&#8217;ve had this very conversation many times in our staffrooom. I went to a workshop and heard David Booth (OISE at U of Toronto) say that the best teacher in the world couldn&#8217;t make a dull book interesting. By dull, of course, he didn&#8217;t mean Homer or Horace; he meant whatever teen novel is in fashion at the moment; Twilight, I suppose. The teacher&#8217;s job is to show kids how Homer and Horace are relevant. the good ones can do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

